AN 846: Intel® Stratix® 10 Forward Error Correction

Download PDF
ID 683805
Date 7/02/2018
Public
Document Table of Contents
Document Table of Contents x
1. Introduction 2. Necessity of Error Correction 3. FEC Selection 4. FEC in Intel® Stratix® 10 H-Tile Devices 5. FEC in Intel® Stratix® 10 E-Tile Devices 6. FEC Implementation Using the E-Tile Channel Placement Tool 7. FEC in Practical Application 8. Hardware Results 9. Document Revision History for AN 846: Intel® Stratix® 10 Forward Error Correction
2. Necessity of Error Correction x
2.1. Solutions to Transmission Errors 2.2. Error Correction Codes 2.3. What is FEC?
2.1. Solutions to Transmission Errors x
2.1.1. Parity and Cyclic Redundancy Check 2.1.2. Error Correction Code (ECC) Block Coding
2.3. What is FEC? x
2.3.1. FEC Definitions
3. FEC Selection x
3.1. Key Considerations when Choosing a FEC
4. FEC in Intel® Stratix® 10 H-Tile Devices x
4.1. Fire Code (802.3ap, 10GBASE-KR)
4.1. Fire Code (802.3ap, 10GBASE-KR) x
4.1.1. FEC Block Format 4.1.2. FEC Block Composition 4.1.3. FEC Sublayer for BASE-R PHYs 4.1.4. L-Tile/H-Tile Implementation
4.1.4. L-Tile/H-Tile Implementation x
4.1.4.1. Transcode Encoder 4.1.4.2. KR FEC Encoder 4.1.4.3. KR FEC Scrambler 4.1.4.4. KR FEC TX Gearbox 4.1.4.5. KR FEC RX Gearbox 4.1.4.6. Transcode Decoder
5. FEC in Intel® Stratix® 10 E-Tile Devices x
5.1. Types of RS-FEC 5.2. 100GBASE-KR4 5.3. 100GBASE-KP4 5.4. FEC Decoders 5.5. Specifications 5.6. Functions Within the RS-FEC Sublayer
5.1. Types of RS-FEC x
5.1.1. RS (528, 514, t = 7, m = 10) 5.1.2. RS (544, 514, t = 15, m = 10) 5.1.3. Supported RS-FEC Modes in E-Tile Devices
5.2. 100GBASE-KR4 x
5.2.1. 100GBASE-KR4 Mapping (IEEE802.3bj Clause 91)
5.3. 100GBASE-KP4 x
5.3.1. 100GBASE-KP4 Mapping (IEEE802.3bj Clause 91)
5.6. Functions Within the RS-FEC Sublayer x
5.6.1. Lane Block Synchronization 5.6.2. Alignment Lock and Deskew 5.6.3. Lane Re-order 5.6.4. Alignment Marker Removal 5.6.5. 64B/66B to 256B/257B Transcoder
7. FEC in Practical Application x
7.1. Datacenter Applications Scenario
8. Hardware Results x
8.1. Test Design 8.2. Test Setup 8.3. Insertion Loss Plots 8.4. FEC Statistics Tool 8.5. Hardware Data 8.6. Comparison to the Specification 8.7. References
1. Introduction
2. Necessity of Error Correction
3. FEC Selection
4. FEC in Intel® Stratix® 10 H-Tile Devices
5. FEC in Intel® Stratix® 10 E-Tile Devices
6. FEC Implementation Using the E-Tile Channel Placement Tool
7. FEC in Practical Application
8. Hardware Results
9. Document Revision History for AN 846: Intel® Stratix® 10 Forward Error Correction

2.3.1. FEC Definitions

FEC is an error correction coding method. There are many types of FEC, including:
  • Reed Solomon
  • Bose-Chadhuri-Hocquenghem (BCH)
  • Concatenated codes

The type you select depends on:

  • The overhead your design permits
  • Burst handling capability
  • Gain versus complexity (number of gates, memory, power, and so on)
  • Latency considerations

There are bit error and burst limits to each code. FEC complexity increases non-linearly as you approach the Shannon limit. The Shannon limit, sometimes called Shannon's theorem, establishes that for any given degree of noise contamination of a communication channel, it is possible to communicate discrete data (digital information) nearly error-free up to a computable maximum rate through the channel.

FEC allows detection and correction of X bits or symbols in a block. There are limits to its correcting capability.

Table 3.  FEC Parameters
Code Type Parameter Description
Binary n = block length
k = message length
Non-binary (RS-FEC, for example) n = block length
k = message length
t = correctable symbols (n-k)/2
m = symbol size
Level Two Title